Columbia university reveals racial preferences in dating

Rated 3.99/5 based on 847 customer reviews

I have no doubt that those who originally conceived of race-preferential admissions policies nearly 50 years ago were acting in good faith.By lowering admissions standards for African-American and Hispanic students at elite colleges and universities, they hoped to increase the number of minority students on campus and ultimately to promote their integration into high-status careers. Should we allow the principle of color blindness under the law to be sacrificed in the hope that in the long run, it will help us become a society of equal opportunity?Mosk’s decision for the California Supreme Court was instantly denounced by supporters of race preferences.Hundreds of demonstrators gathered beneath his office window to demand its reversal. When visiting local campuses, Mosk would routinely find himself greeted by picketers and hecklers.We have fewer African-American scientists, physicians, and engineers and likely fewer lawyers and college professors.If, as the evidence indicates, the effects of race-preferential admissions policies are exactly the opposite of what was originally intended, it is difficult to understand why anyone would wish to support them rather than adhere to the principle of color blindness.Mounting empirical research shows that race-preferential admissions policies are doing more harm than good.

On the other hand, the average “disadvantaged track” admittee in 1973 had MCAT scores in the 35th percentile (Science); 46th percentile (Verbal); 24th percentile (Quantitative); and 33rd percentile (General Information).

“Lawsuits are won and lost in courtrooms, not on the streets.”[5] At the time, Mosk would probably have laughed to hear his insistence on color blindness characterized as “conservative.” Up to then, he had been accused far more frequently of leaning too far to the left.

But whatever his political persuasion, Mosk had been a stalwart ally of the civil rights movement from its beginning.

By 1976, when Mosk was writing, we owed it to ourselves to be more skeptical.

The case was brought by Allan Bakke, the son of a mailman and a schoolteacher—hardly a scion of wealth and privilege.

Leave a Reply